Brisbane news live: Government claims Cross River Rail cost has more than tripled | Water released from dams after heavy rain | PM condemns ‘another antisemitic attack’

May Be Interested In:Helldivers 2’s Illuminate faction unleashes deadly new enemy terrors as latest update lands


A Brisbane barrister has lost the battle to regain his law licence due to his “irresponsible and reckless” approach to almost $640,000 in debts over loans, court orders and unpaid taxes.

Former Brisbane barrister Salvatore ‘Sam’ Di Carlo, 68, took action against the Bar Association of Queensland in October 2024, seeking to overturn its decision to refuse to renew his practising certificate.

The association argued Di Carlo was “not a fit a proper person” to practise law in Queensland due to multiple breaches of its rules.

Former barrister Sam Di Carlo leaving Brisbane Magistrates Court after representing a client while he was still practicing law.Credit: Jorge Branco

Di Carlo failed to disclose in 2018 he had been fined $4000 for contempt of court because it “slipped his mind” and also failed to disclose health issues that could affect his abilities.

He also owed nearly $398,400 to the Australian Taxation Office in the form of income tax, GST interest and penalties.

The District Court in June ordered Di Carlo to provide a financial statement after it enforced a woman’s claim that he had not repaid the remaining $240,000 from cash loans granted between July and December 2015.

Di Carlo did not properly respond to the summons before giving notice of his bankruptcy in August 2024 and departing Australia on a flight to China just before the matter was due in court.

Justice Thomas Bradley handed down his judgment in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal this week, denying Di Carlo’s bid to get his law licence back.

The judge said Di Carlo, who had worked for 33 years as a barrister, knew his legal obligations and had shown a public disrespect for the District Court.

He said a person’s conduct was the surest guide to their character.

“By his conduct he showed himself unsuitable to share what (High Court Justice Frank Walters Kitto) called the privilege of the intimate relationship and intimate collaboration with the courts and with fellow members of the bar,” he said.

AAP

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

$791,000 per race: The reason Aussie Formula 1 driver could be out of a job
$791,000 per race: The reason Aussie Formula 1 driver could be out of a job
‘It’s why I play footy’: Wallabies skipper reveals his future
‘It’s why I play footy’: Wallabies skipper reveals his future
Perth doctor charged over fatal crash
Perth doctor charged over fatal crash
Sydney’s 95-year-old tennis icon who’s not quitting anytime soon
Sydney’s 95-year-old tennis icon who’s not quitting anytime soon
Polls show WA Labor could win historic third term
Polls show WA Labor could win historic third term
The latest illustrations from artist Cathy Wilcox
The latest illustrations from artist Cathy Wilcox
Your World, Your News: Stay Informed | © 2024 | Daily News